Facebook’s Timeline: a masterclass in product vision

September 23rd, 2011 by Yali

The web is full of chatter as the world digests Facebook’s announcements at yesterday’s F8 developer conference of Timeline and OpenGraph.

Chris Coxs presentation at F8 is essential viewing for anyone in product management

Chris Cox's presentation at F8 is essential viewing for anyone in product management

The purpose of this post is not to summarise the developments or hypothesise on the implications: there are plenty of pundits doing that already. In this post we explore the importance of product vision to successful product development, and use Facebook’s Timeline as an exemplar of best practice.
Read the rest of this entry »

Final thoughts following the London mashup event “Like: like me, love my data”

May 25th, 2010 by Yali


Last night’s mashup event, which looked at the Facebook / privacy debate, and how Facebook’s new “Like” functionality plays into that debate, proved both lively and thought provoking.

There was no chance of a consensus emerging amongst participants, illustrating how divided people are on this complicated issue.  It did prompt me to draw a number of conclusions:
Read the rest of this entry »

Monetising your community site through value chain mapping

February 2nd, 2010 by Alex

Community

Here at Keplar some of our recent advisory work has been for online community sites, helping them to improve their customer proposition while also growing their revenues. In the course of these projects we have started to develop a new technique for guiding the development of these sites which we call “value chain mapping” – a technique that works to improve the way community sites serve their community whilst simultaneously growing their revenue. This blog post aims to explain this technique – articulating the theory but also providing practical advice for owners of social networks. (None of the companies mentioned in this post are current or past clients of Keplar.)

Vertical social networks: a primer

For this post we focus on “vertical” social networks – these are simply community-oriented websites which focus on one content area, interest group or demographic. We use the word vertical to distinguish these community sites from general-purpose social networks such as Facebook and Bebo. For this post we use Mumsnet, the UK website “by parents for parents”, as our main example.

So, what does a vertical social network look like? Typically these sites provide their user community with a set of “soft tools” such as forums, profiles and articles, all designed to support the site’s users in socialising, sharing knowledge and fulfilling specific needs. On Mumsnet, those user needs would include childminding, keeping their child healthy, and finding a kindergarten.

On the monetisation side, vertical social networks generate most of their revenues through advertising – showing users targeted or general banner ads but also directing users towards relevant businesses for a fee (see for example the Mumsnet Mall). It’s a delicate balancing act for the site owners as communities respond badly to advertising which they deem excessive, irrelevant or dishonest.

So, what’s wrong with this model?

Read the rest of this entry »

An open letter to Spotify: you have an amazing opportunity, don’t blow it!

December 9th, 2009 by Yali

spotifylogo

Dear Spotify,

We know that you are one of the most exciting companies of the moment.  Everyone, from the Guardian, to Techcrunch and e-consultancy is singing your praises.  In spite of all the hype, we actually believe that Spotify remains under-hyped.

It’s about more than your business model

Mainstream media interest in Spotify has focussed on your business model.  The music industry has of course been badly hit by the growth of the internet, the rise in piracy and the shift in consumer spend to video games.  As a result, almost all of the coverage has narrowly focused on this question of whether you can make the music industry profitable, and whether you can be profitable yourself.  People have, shockingly, compared Spotify to We7, shocking because We7’s sole purpose is to deliver ad supported music to consumers for free, and the Spotify proposition offers a whole lot more.

It’s about a whole new way of consuming music

It is tempting, given Spotify’s iTunes-like interface, to think of it as just another music delivery mechanism, one that’s preferable to downloads because it is easier to protect against piracy.  But that misses the point.  Streaming music allows you to potentially offer your users two new types of listening experiences, without parallel in competitor services.  One of these has already been launched, and I hope that we don’t have to wait long for the second:

1.  Transform my mobile phone into the ultimate MP3 player

Spotify’s premium service for iPhone, Android and Symbian is incredible.  I have access to (almost) any song, at any time, immediately.  It doesn’t matter that my iPhone has only 8Gb.  I have instant access to an enormous music catalogue, unparalleled by even the biggest private collections.

2. Social consumption of music

Spotify has barely scratched the surface of the social features they could build around their product.  Sharing playlists is just the beginning.  I want to be able to discuss tracks with other music enthusiasts as I listen to them (and we listen to them together, in real-time), lookup forthcoming gigs, browse other people’s libraries for new music, send tracks to friends, even potentially talk to the artist while we’re both online.

How does Spotify seize these opportunities?

Given the potential, it’s a little disappointing how quickly you are progressing with your music revolution. Some recommendations:

1. Start properly marketing / advertising the services you already offer

Your mobile phone app is nothing short of incredible.  It has serious mainstream appeal.  You should be all over mainstream media telling people: “we can turn your phone into the ultimate MP3 player”  Don’t get stuck, as Skype did, trying to monetise your cost conscious, tech-savvy early adopters, but rather start advertising directly to the thousands of people who would kill to have a limitless library of music in their pockets.

2. Develop social features – quick!

A flippant thing remark, perhaps, but it needs saying.  Those social features aren’t “nice to haves” – they’re key in differentiating the Spotify proposition from everything that’s gone before it.  And that’s important because music piracy means by and large people are much less willing to pay for just the vanilla experience of listening to individual tracks.  However they may well, for example, be willing to browse and listen to their favourite artist’s music collection – be that Rev Run or Paul McCartney.  Especially if they can do so with their friends, compare notes, and rate it.  And imagine if they could do it with the artist him/herself?

There are several challenges to developing the social features quickly.  One option you might want to consider is opening up your platform.  Your core audio streaming system is brilliant – why not follow the path of Facebook or Twitter and nurture an imaginative developer community to build a wealth of different apps to take advantage of that core technology?

And if it all sounds like a bit much?  Hire Keplar LLP ;-)